翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Goddard High Resolution Spectrograph ・ Goddard High School ・ Goddard High School (Kansas) ・ Goddard High School (New Mexico) ・ Goddard House ・ Goddard House (Worcester, Massachusetts) ・ Goddard Institute for Space Studies ・ Goddard Lieberson ・ Goddard Memorial State Park ・ Goddard Oxenbridge ・ Goddard problem ・ Goddard Rocket Launching Site ・ Goddard School ・ Goddard Site ・ Goddard Space Flight Center ・ Goddard v. Google, Inc. ・ Goddard's Green ・ Goddard's Green, Berkshire ・ Goddard, Kansas ・ Goddard, Kentucky ・ Goddard, Maryland ・ Goddards ・ Goddards Green, West Sussex ・ Goddard–Thorn theorem ・ Godden ・ Godden Green ・ Godden Mackay Logan ・ Goddert ・ Godderthorne Hundred ・ Goddess Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Goddard v. Google, Inc. ： ウィキペディア英語版 Goddard v. Google, Inc. ''Goddard v. Google, Inc.'', 640 F. Supp. 2d 1193 (N.D. Cal. Jul. 30, 2009), is a case in which Jenna Goddard (“Plaintiff”) alleged that she and a class of similarly situated individuals were harmed by Google ("Defendant") as a result of clicking allegedly fraudulent web-based advertisements for mobile subscription services (“MSSPs”). The United States District Court for the Northern District of California held that the action was barred by Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act ("CDA") and dismissed the complaint without leave to amend. ==Facts and procedural history== While on Google's search results page, Plaintiff clicked on advertisements that led her to allegedly fraudulent websites. She then entered her cell phone number on the allegedly fraudulent sites to download ringtones, an action for which she was unknowingly charged. Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against Google on April 13, 2008, claiming that she was an intended third-party beneficiary of Google's AdWords Content Policy that Google failed to adequately enforce by aiding and abetting the fraud sites.〔''Goddard v. Google, Inc.'', No. 08-2738, (2008 WL 5245490, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101890 ) (N.D. Cal. Dec. 17, 2008).〕 Google asserted that each of Plaintiff's claims was barred by the CDA, which prevents a website from being treated as the "publisher or speaker" of third-party content. The court rejected Plaintiff's "artful" pleading and dismissed her complaint with leave to amend in a decision issued on December 17, 2008.〔 In her amended complaint, Plaintiff alleged that "Google's involvement in creating the allegedly fraudulent advertisements was so pervasive that the company controlled much of the underlying commercial activity engaged in by the third-party advertisers."〔''Goddard v. Google, Inc.'', (640 F. Supp. 2d 1193 ) (N.D. Cal. Jul. 30, 2009).〕 She further asserted that Google "not only encourages illegal conduct, but collaborates in the development of the illegal content and, effectively, requires its advertiser customers to engage in it."〔 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Goddard v. Google, Inc.」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.